Anti-HLA Antibodies After Precocious Transplantectomy by Vascular Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Our objective in this study was to determine the effects of early renal transplantectomy on patients and the production of anti-human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies. METHODS: Between January 2003 and May 2017, we analyzed a group of patients for the presence of specific HLA class I and/or II donor-specific antibodies (DSA), their panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), and the time period in which the antibodies were still detectable after transplantectomy. RESULTS: Anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 60.8% of patients, 60.8% and 52.2% of those patients had anti-class I and anti-class II antibodies, respectively. DSA were detected in 91.7% of the anti-HLA class I patients. Class II DSA were detected all of the patients with anti-HLA class II antibodies. The average (mean ± SD) PRA levels in our patients after transplantectomy was 60 ± 34% in class I and 63 ± 36% in class II. CONCLUSION: Anti-HLA antibodies can be detected well after transplantectomy. Even if the kidney allograft had been transplanted for only a short time, when the intensity of immunosuppression was the highest, many patients developed anti-HLA antibodies. The patients who continued with immunosuppression after transplantectomy did not develop anti-HLA antibodies.

Efficacy of dialysis in peritoneal dialysis: utility of bioimpedance to calculate Kt/V and the search for a target Kt.

BACKGROUND: To calculate Kt/V, volume (V) is usually obtained by Watson formula, but bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a simple and applicable technique to determinate V, along with other hydration and nutrition parameters, in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Dialysis efficacy can also be measured with Kt, but no experience exists in PD, so there is no reference/target value for Kt that must be achieved in these patients to be considered adequately dialyzed. We evaluated the efficacy of PD with Kt/V using Watson formula and BIS for V calculation, assessed hydration status in a PD unit by data obtained by BIS, and attempted to find a reference Kt from the Kt/V previously obtained by BIS. METHODS: In this observational prospective study of 78 PD patients, we measured V using BIS (V bis) and Watson formula (V w) and calculated weekly Kt/V using both volumes (Kt/V bis/V bis and Kt/V w). With the BIS technique, we obtained and subsequently analyzed other hydration status parameters. We achieved a reference Kt, extrapolating the value desired (weekly Kt/V 1.7) to the target Kt using the simple linear regression statistical technique, basing it on the results of the previously calculated Pearson's linear correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Volume was 1.8 l higher by Watson formula than with BIS (p < 0.001). Weekly Kt/V bis was 2.33 ± 0.68, and mean weekly Kt/V w was 2.20 ± 0.63 (p < 0.0001); 60.25 % of patients presented overhydration according to the BIS study (OH >1.1 l). The target value of Kt for the reference weekly Kt/V bis (1.7) was 64.87 l. CONCLUSIONS: BIS is a simple, applicable technique for calculating V in dialysis that can be especially useful in PD patients compared with the anthropometric formulas, by the abnormally distributed body water in these patients. Other parameters obtained by BIS will serve to assess both the distribution of body volume and nutritional status in the clinical setting. The target Kt value obtained from Kt/V bis allowed us to measure the efficacy of PD in a practical way, omitting V measurement.

[Short cold ischaemia time optimises transplant results for kidneys from expanded criteria donors]. / El tiempo de isquemia fría corto optimiza los resultados de los trasplantes renales efectuados con donantes con criterios expandidos.

INTRODUCTION: Outcome of renal transplant from expanded criteria donors (ECD) is usually inferior than those from standard criteria donors (SCD) and may be improved decreasing cold ischemia time (CIT) and minimizing preservation injury. We compare the results obtained with CIT <15 hours in kidney transplants from ECD vs SCD. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Prospective, single center study of kidney transplants performed since June 2003 to December 2007. Minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Data of donors, receptors and transplant outcome from ECD and SCD are compared. RESULTS: CIT (mean +/- SD) was 9.3+/-2.5 hours in transplants from ECD (n=24) and 8.3+/-3.3 hours in those from SCD (N=50), p=0.18. We did not find significant differences among recipients of grafts from ECD and those from SCD regarding: primary non-function (4.2% vs 2%, respectively), delayed graft function (16.7% vs 10%), surgical complications (25% vs 16%) or acute rejection episodes (8.3% vs 2%). Glomerular filtration rate at one year follow-up was 65.8+/-14.9 ml/min in ECD recipients and 49.4+/-12.5 ml/min (p<0.0001). One year graft survival was 95.8% in ECD recipients and 94% in SCD recipients (p=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Short CIT in kidney transplant from ECD leads to similar outcome than that obtained from SCD, although renal function is inferior in ECD grafts.

El tiempo de isquemia fría corto optimiza los resultados de los trasplantes renales efectuados con donantes con criterios expandidos / No disponible

Introducción: Los resultados de los trasplantes efectuados condonantes con criterios expandidos (DCE) son inferiores a los obtenidos con donantes con criterios estándar (DCS). Para optimizar su evolución, se podría reducir su tiempo de isquemiafría (TIF) reduciendo su daño de preservación. Comparamoslos resultados obtenidos al aplicar TIF <15 horas tanto a DCE como a DCS. Material y métodos: Realizamos un estudio unicéntrico, de cohortes, prospectivo, de casos incidentes de trasplante renal de cadáver entre junio de 2003 y diciembre de2007. El tiempo mínimo de seguimiento fue de 12 meses. Comparamos los datos de los donantes, de los receptores y de la evolución de los trasplantes efectuados con DCE frente a los de los DCS. Resultados: El TIF para los DCE (N = 24) y para los DCS (N = 50) fue, respectivamente, de 9,3 ± 2,5 y 8,3± 3,3 horas (p = 0,18). No encontramos diferencias significativas entre los receptores de DCE y DCS en cuanto a: no función primaria del injerto 4,2 vs. 4%, retardo en la función del injerto 16,7 vs. 10%, complicaciones quirúrgicas 25 vs. 16% y rechazos agudos 8,3 vs. 2%. El filtrado glomerular estimado al año para los DCS fue de 65,8 ± 14,9 ml/min y para los DCE de 49,4 ± 12,5 ml/min (p <0,0001). La supervivencia renal al año fue del 95,8% para los receptores de DCE y del 94% para los DCS (p = 0,75). Conclusiones: La aplicación de TIF cortos a los DCE permite conseguir una evolución similar a la de los DCS, aunque su función renal sea en todo momento inferior (AU)

Introduction: Outcome of renal transplant from expanded criteria donors (ECD) is usually inferior than those from standard criteria donors (SCD) and may be improved decreasing cold ischemia time (CIT) and minimizing preservation injury. We compare the results obtained with CIT <15 hours in kidney transplants from ECD vs. SCD. Subjects and Methods: Prospective, single center study of kidney transplants performed since June 2003 to December 2007. Minimum follow-up period was 12months. Data of donors, receptors and transplant outcome from ECD and SCD are compared. Results: CIT (mean ± SD)was 9.3 ± 2.5 hours in transplants from ECD (n = 24) and8.3 ± 3.3 hours in those from SCD (N = 50), p = 0.18. We did not find significant differences among recipients of grafts from ECD and those from SCD regarding: primary non-function (4.2% vs. 2%, respectively), delayed graft function (16.7% vs. 10%), surgical complications (25% vs.16%) or acute rejection episodes (8.3% vs. 2%).Glomerular filtration rate at one year follow-up was 65.8± 14.9 ml/min in ECD recipients and 49.4 ± 12.5 ml/min (p<0.0001). One year graft survival was 95.8% in ECD recipients and 94% in SCD recipients (p = 0.75).Conclusions: Short CIT in kidney transplant from ECD leads to similar outcome than that obtained from SCD, although renal function is inferior in ECD grafts (AU)

Conversion to tacrolimus extended-release formulation: short-term clinical results.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the short-term clinical results of conversion of treatment from tacrolimus twice daily (BID TAC) to the extended-release formulation (OD TAC), milligram for milligram, and whether such conversion is safe in stable kidney transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 38 kidney transplant recipients (median [SD] age, 54.3 [14.4] years) with stable renal function (mean [SD] serum creatinine concentration 1.29 [0.38] mg/dL). Posttransplantation follow-up was 3.4 (3.1) years (range, 4-168 months). All patients had been receiving BID TAC (2.45 [1.52] mg/d) when treatment was converted to OD TAC, milligram for milligram. Follow-up including clinical evaluation and laboratory tests was at 7, 21, and 90 days postconversion. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed during follow-up in serum creatinine concentration, blood glucose level, hemoglobin level, or proteinuria. There were no episodes of acute rejection. No de novo posttransplantation diabetes mellitus was diagnosed; patients with diabetes required similar dosage of hypoglycemia treatment. Arterial pressure remained stable without changes in antihypertension treatment. Tacrolimus doses were not modified (2.45 [1.52] mg/d at baseline vs 2.45 [1.67] mg/d at 3 months postconversion; however, tacrolimus concentration decreased significantly (7.6 [1.8] ng/mL at baseline vs 6.42 [1.13] ng/mL at 3 months postconversion. Reduction in tacrolimus concentration was more remarkable in patients receiving a dose of less than 0.025 mg/kg/d. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from BID TAC to OD TAC, milligram for milligram, is clinically safe; however, monitoring of tacrolimus concentration in patients receiving low dosage is mandatory to prevent subtherapeutic levels.

Glomerulonefritis aguda post-estreptocócica en paciente añoso / Acute post-estreptoccocal glomerulonephritis in the elderly

No disponible

No disponible

Renal paratransplant hernia: an unusual complication of renal transplantation?

Renal paratransplant hernia constitutes an unusual variant of internal hernia caused by entrapment of bowel through a defect in the peritoneum covering the transplanted kidney. Only three cases have been previously reported. We present three new cases of renal paratransplant hernia. Abdominal pain and vomiting were the main symptoms. Clinical diagnosis of bowel obstruction and paratransplant hernia was reached using abdominal CT scan. All patients underwent an emergency surgical procedure, and one patient needed resection of necrotic bowel. The three patients survived owing to early surgical intervention, and they were discharged asymptomatic. Paratransplant hernia represented 1.1% of our series of transplant patients. Early diagnosis and surgical treatment are esential in transplant patients with bowel obstruction to avoid high morbidity and mortality rates.